» » The First Crusade and the Idea of Crusading

Download The First Crusade and the Idea of Crusading fb2

by Jonathan Riley-Smith
Download The First Crusade and the Idea of Crusading fb2
World
  • Author:
    Jonathan Riley-Smith
  • ISBN:
    0812213637
  • ISBN13:
    978-0812213638
  • Genre:
  • Publisher:
    University of Pennsylvania Press (June 1, 1991)
  • Pages:
    236 pages
  • Subcategory:
    World
  • Language:
  • FB2 format
    1741 kb
  • ePUB format
    1401 kb
  • DJVU format
    1561 kb
  • Rating:
    4.1
  • Votes:
    589
  • Formats:
    docx doc mobi azw


In this book, Riley-Smith focuses on ancillary questions. Riley-Smith is the man who single-handedly blew up the myth that crusading was a way to relieve Western Europe of surplus younger sons, or to grab new lands in the east.

In this book, Riley-Smith focuses on ancillary questions. It wasn't land, and it wasn't wealth. Instead, Riley-Smith argues persuasively that it was because up until the late 1000s, knights were commonly rebuked by the church for their (very real) sins of anger, extortion, violence, and lust.

Jonathan Riley-Smith is Dixie Professor Emeritus of Ecclesiastical History at the University of Cambridge and author of many books, most recently The Crusades, Christianity, and Islam. Библиографические данные. The First Crusade and the Idea of Crusading The Middle Ages Series. Jonathan Riley-Smith.

Riley-Smith's work is based upon a thorough knowledge of the sources, breaking new ground in his use of the charters of departing Crusaders as evidence for their forms of motivation. -Journal of Religion. Jonathan Riley-Smith is Dixie Professor Emeritus of Ecclesiastical History at the University of Cambridge and author of many books, most recently The Crusades, Christianity, and Islam.

Jonathan Riley-Smith. But there is no way I would read this book if I didn't have to. It is not an easy read. There is also a lot of good information in there, for those of us who have the time and inclination to get to it. It is a tedious slog. Having said that, it is relatively short +- 150 pages of actual content, so at least you will only be board out of your mind for a few hours.

Jonathan Simon Christopher Riley-Smith GCStJ FRHistS (27 June 1938 – 13 September 2016) was a historian of the Crusades, and, between 1994 and 2005, Dixie Professor of Ecclesiastical History at Cambridge. He was a Fellow of Emmanuel College, Cambridge. Riley-Smith was the eldest of four children born into a prosperous Yorkshire brewing family. Close X. Learn about new offers and get more deals by joining our newsletter.

Professor Jonathan Riley-Smith.

In his book, Riley-Smith sets out five main arguments to show how these . The failure of the crusade of 1101 only cemented the idea of the first crusade being a miracle.

In his book, Riley-Smith sets out five main arguments to show how these ideas of crusading evolved. Riley-Smith makes excellent points about the crusade; however, before one can delve directly into his argument, one must first understand the background surrounding the rise of the first crusade. Throughout the ten-century, particularly in France, the world had become an extremely violent place. The ideas if of the first crusaders were seen as being somewhat crude, and thus needed theological refinement to be morally acceptable. The Army of the First Crusade and the Crusade Vow: Some Reflections on a Recent Book. Speculum 63 (3):714-717 (1988). James A. Brundage - 1971 - Mediaeval Studies 33 (1):334-343. Crusade, Commerce and Culture. Aziz S. AtiyaCulture and the Crusade: Historiography and Bibliography. Steven Runciman - 1964 - Speculum 39 (1):110-112. Jay Rubenstein, Armies of Heaven: The First Crusade and the Quest for Apocalypse. New York: Basic Books, 2011. Pp. Xiv, 402; 8 Color Plates, 6 Black-and-White Figures, and Maps.

Focusing on the inner-workings of the First Crusade in a way that no other work has done, The First Crusade and the Idea of Crusading delves into the Crusade's organization, its finances, and the division of authority and responsibility among its leaders and their relationships with one another and with their subordinates.

In the year 1095, Pope Urban II initiated what is known today as the First Crusade. Following what was then conventional practice among church reformers, the Pope referred to his war of liberation as Christ's own war, to be fought in accordance with God's will and intentions.

Urban II called this a war of liberation for two reasons: one, to free the church of Jerusalem from oppression and pillage by the Muslims and to liberate western churches in general; and two, to free the city of Jerusalem from the servitude into which it has fallen. This summons of the lay knight to the faith between 1095 and 1096 was Urban II's personal response to an appeal that had reached him from eastern Christians.

In this classic work, Jonathan Riley-Smith, today one of the world's most renowned crusade historians, approaches this central and well-known topic of medieval history with freshness and impeccable research. Through the vivid presentation of a wide range of European chronicles and charter collections, Riley-Smith provides a striking illumination of crusader motives and responses and a thoughtful analysis of the mechanisms that made this expedition successful.


HelloBoB:D
This is a brilliant book by a leading historian of the crusades. It needs to be understood on its own terms: it's a detailed analysis of *why* so many Europeans set off on the 1st Crusade. Riley-Smith has produced a closely-argued analysis that places the crusade within the context of the world of eleventh-century Europe that created it. This isn't the place to go if you want accounts of the battles of the crusade, and it isn't a "light" read. But it's extremely valuable---I've assigned it several times to my classes.
Kajikus
Riley Smith focuses on the title of his book, that is what he wants to present and does. It is not a light read, but anyway it is very clear and dinamic; the author presents facts in an interesting and condensed way, and he does take time (we apreciate that!)to explain the sources he has used in his investigation.
Felhann
As a student of history, not focused on the period, I found this book a hard and annoying read. Riley-Smith focuses too much on proving his arguments through repetative evidence, and only through a close examination and arduous reading of the title from front to end does one gain a good understanding of what Riley-Smith wanted to convey. The art of story-telling does not live in this one...
Olwado
I needed to read this book for a class, and of all the books I have read on the crusade this is by far the most boring.
Keath
Riley-Smith, widely acknowledged as an expert in Crusade studies, has presented here a book which is not a dry recitation of Crusade facts but instead an examination of motives behind the Crusade: WHY did the Crusading knights choose to heed Urban's call and head off into a strange land to fight? WHY did Urban issue that call in the first place? What were the kinds of hardships a Crusader might have faced?

This is an extremely well-written, well-researched book and I would recommend it to anyone interested in the fields of medieval or Crusade studies.