- Author:Joy Tiuy
- Publisher:Imprint unknown (April 1972)
- Pages:62 pages
- FB2 format1961 kb
- ePUB format1806 kb
- DJVU format1947 kb
- Formats:mbr lrf txt azw
The Concept and Determination of Carrying Capacity of Recreational Land in the .
The Concept and Determination of Carrying Capacity of Recreational Land in the . April 1974 · Journal of Applied Ecology. When a steel ladle is to be replaced, a larger filling volume and a smaller dead weight (carrying capacity of cranes) of the new ladle are often considered as a means to increase the output of the steel plant.
Start by marking The Concept And Determination Of Carrying . Be the first to ask a question about The Concept And Determination Of Carrying Capacity Of Recreational Land In The Usa.
Concept and Determination of Carrying Capacity of Recreational Land in the . Lists with This Book.
In population biology, carrying capacity is defined as the environment's maximal load, which is different from the concept of population equilibrium
Originally published in Planners Network, No. 218, March.
1998) A History of Waste Management in New York City. Originally published in Planners Network, No. Further references: The Chicago Manual of Style, (1993). University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
The concept also carries a number of assumptions that are unsupported in the real world and raises questions about the objectives of tourism and protected area management actions. The conditions needed to establish a carrying capacity are rarely achieved in the real world. There may be specific and limited situations where numer- ical capacities may be appropriate (parking lots, et. but these are often a function of investment.
CCS occasional paper ; no. . 1971, together with a bibliography on the ecological effects of recreational activities Joy Tivy. 3. Bibliography, etc. Note . book below: (C) 2016-2018 All rights are reserved by their owners.
The concept of carrying capacity has gained broad currency, although some population ecologists are dubious about its value. This paper assesses the utility of the concept and develops an alternative understanding of population growth. First, carrying capacity is viewed in historical perspective and evidence that is supposed to support it is criticized. Then the underlying assumptions upon which it rests are reexamined. Limits to growth are seen to be both multiple and variable.
Recreational carrying capacity is defined as the level of recreational use an area can sustain without an unacceptable .
Recreational carrying capacity is defined as the level of recreational use an area can sustain without an unacceptable degree of deterioration of the character and quality of the resource or of the recreation experience (Pigram, 1983). Within this broad definition, four categories are recognized: physical, ecological, economic, and social carrying capacities (Brotherton, 1973). Physical carrying capacity is essentially a design concept, based on the number of use units (people, cars, boats, and vehicles) that can physically be accommodated in a certain area (Fig.
6 Solvent consumption capacity in Annex I section . The guidance does not represent an official position of the Commission and cannot be invoked as such in th. Guidance on Interpretation and Determination of Capacity under the IPPC Directive. The guidance does not represent an official position of the Commission and cannot be invoked as such in the context of legal proceedings. Final judgements concerning the interpretation of the Directive can only be made by the European Court of Justice.